Implementation plan
Phases, resources, risks, and mitigations for the completed ControlSift capstone.
Phases
Resources used
- Compute: local CPU for classical work; Kaggle / Colab free GPU path for Gemma experiments.
- Models: TF-IDF + logistic regression; Gemma 3 1B; QLoRA with 4-bit NF4.
- Platforms: GitHub, GitHub Pages, Hugging Face, Kaggle / Colab.
- Data: synthetic evidence packets only; no employer, patient, or customer evidence.
- People: solo project with assistive tooling for drafting and engineering support.
Risk management
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation / outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Lexical shortcut | Artificially easy benchmark | Hardened the generator before sealing v1.1 classical results. |
| Overclaiming AI performance | False success narrative | Preserved the QLoRA negative result and low parse-success rate. |
| Cross-version comparison | Misleading leaderboard | Classical v1.1 and Gemma v1.0 are disclosed separately; cross-version scores are descriptive only. |
| Synthetic-to-real overgeneralization | Unsafe production interpretation | Explicit non-production scope, Limitations, Intended Use, and human-review requirements. |
| Secret exposure | Credential compromise | Tokens remain in platform secret stores and are excluded from git. |
| Format miss | Capstone rejection | Rubric-facing report, exactly eight slides, and the final under-five-minute narrated presentation are complete. |